Most company blogs are ghostwritten?

2007 April 20
by Cornelius

Geert D, a trade marketing manager at Microsoft, has an interesting post about Marc Bresseel, another Microsofter who has recently launched a blog. Geert quotes Bresseel as saying about his blog:

It is not ghostwritten like most corporate blogs; it’s authentic and hand made.

I’m a little intrigued by this evaluation. Is it merely Bresseel’s impression that many corporate blogs are ghostwritten, or is there any concrete evidence that would support such a claim? Do we both interpret the term ghostwriting in the same way, or possibly with different connotations?

I have no doubt at all that many corporate blogs, especially those dedicated to marketing and PR as well as executive blogs, see significant editing before they are published. But editing is not the same as ghostwriting. Putting it radically, I think letting someone else write your blog as a CEO is no different than to have someone else give newspaper interviews under your name. There is no betting way to wreck your credibility if you’re found out, plus your ghostwriter could publish something you don’t agree with - at least that’s my take. Opinions?

2 Comments
2007 April 20

Ghostwriting is very easy to spot. You can easily distinguish between the writing styles of two people. If the CEO has written some other content elsewhere, it is pretty easy to figure out if someone else is writing on the blog. Things like the choice of words, type of adjectives, key phrases, etc. distinguish one person from another.

2007 April 21

An experienced writer might be able to emulate another person’s style to a certain degree, but I agree that that the difference would still be visible in most cases.

My impression is that regular editing is much more common than actual ghostblogging. Having someone check a text and make a few minor alterations seems more plausible than paying someone to ghostblog.

Comments are closed for this entry.