The luxury of pupose-less blogging can be a good thing

2008 May 5
by Cornelius

Edit: Be sure to read Krishna Kumar’s take on blogging, work and creativity.

Oh my, I didn’t manage to write a single post in the whole of April.

While blogging fatigue seems to be a widespread phenomenon, it’s a particularly soft spot when your research is largely about blogging and you are in the process of organizing a panel at an international conference concerned chiefly with personal Web publishing technologies and how they are changing how we talk about science - among other things.

But, as always, time is the essence. I’m starting to wonder what on Earth I was doing a year ago that allowed me to blog so much (or rather: what I was not doing). Perhaps that’s the wrong way of looking at it though. Yes, blogging takes a lot of time, but it very much depends on how you approach it. Maybe I’ve been a little too concerned with saying it all, i.e. with restricting myself to the planned, substantial and structured writing that we are accustomed to in other contexts . Blogging isn’t always like that and I believe that that’s a good thing. The minimal audience for a blog, as I love to repeat incessantly, is its author. In other words, a blog can be useful as a tool to systematically structure your thoughts - nothing more, nothing less. Forgetting about readership and self-reflexivity (i.e. thinking What is this good for? What goal am I trying to achieve?) can be exactly the right kind of self-motivating strategy. Don’t get me wrong - blogging with a purpose is great. But the luxury of having no specific purpose in mind can be a good thing sometimes, especially when you’re starting to feel that blog writing is actually a burden, a chore that you have to take care of. Obviously, when you’re writing for an institution or in a professional context you are well-advised to think of your readers. But if you’re not enjoying what you do it’s bound to show sooner or later and it seems that with blogging, much of the pleasure that people draw from the activity is a direct result of its unfocusedness - a sort of ‘my blog is my castle’-attitude in communicative terms.

A friend once told me she preferred the original way of blogging: “rambling incoherently to yourself on the street”. Blogging doesn’t have to be quite that bad, but sometimes it helps to ramble just a bit.

4 Comments
2008 May 6

Good post Cornelius because you reveal something about yourself and how your reasons for blogging have changed over time. Keep the thoughts flowing, even if its just a few paragraphs, writing just for yourself sometimes is a good idea.

I’ve been thinking that blogging is a little like new journalism, an ongoing story with facts and subjectivity.

2008 May 6

“An ongoing story with facts and subjectivity”. I like that. I think that the flexibility of blogs sometimes makes it hard to decide what exactly your focus is, since theoretically you can write about anything. But I agree - not all writing needs an audience of more than one.

2008 May 8

A few years ago, I took a number of classes in geology, and became so interested in the subject I even started a research project. The need to find answer meant I had to improve my knowledge of chemistry, a dry (or wet) subject in the best of times. Yet Geology is all about chemistry, and once I had a question, I needed chemistry to answer that question. Science is often so stark, we journey into the unknown very quickly. In business there is less unexplored territory. Yet, each of us has questions that drive our passions. What interests me in reading blogs are the answers to those questions, but also learning about the motivations and delights people experience from taking the journey. Oh, plus we make a profit too. Not something you do often in geology, except when mining Kimberlite. ;-)

2008 June 30

[...] The luxury of pupose-less blogging can be a good thing [...]

Pingback

Comments are closed for this entry.